Synthetic biology: Presumably the sky is the limit

synthetic biologists keep getting lucky, then maybe — just maybe — they will be able to engineer life “on the scale of building a mouse, like the whole thing,

Filed under  //  Opinions  
Comments (0)
Posted

Complexity of synthetic biological circuits has begun to flatten out

A 2009 review1 showed that although the number of published synthetic biological circuits has risen over the past few years, the complexity of those circuits — or the number of regulatory parts they use — has begun to flatten out.

Filed under  //  Opinions  
Comments (0)
Posted

Artificial ribosome: One of the biggest discoveries in science in year 2009

Creating life from scratch took a leap forward in 2009. Scientists led by Harvard's George Church unveiled a synthetic ribosome, the machinery inside cells that translates genes into proteins that build tissues and organs. Scientists hope to create cells, the building blocks of life, from scratch by cobbling together such cellular machinery, part of a burgeoning field of "synthetic" biology.

Filed under  //  Opinions  
Comments (0)
Posted

Synthetica: an extra branch to the Tree of Life

The Synthetic Kingdom is part of our new nature.

Image Credits daisyginsberg.com

Image Credits daisyginsberg.com

Filed under  //  Opinions   Videos  
Comments (0)
Posted

Rudy Rucker on Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is different, it’s about building slippery wetware entities that might live in the real world.

The synthetic biology approach is onto something big—a new version of nanotechnology, which is the craft of manufacturing things at the molecular scale. Synthetic biology’s plan is to capitalize on the fact that biology is already doing molecular fabrication all the time. What might happen if we repurpose biology to our own ends?

One big worry is what nanotechnologists call the “gray-goo problem.” What’s to stop a particularly virulent synthetic organism from eating everything on earth? My guess is that this could never happen. Every existing plant, animal, fungus and protozoan already aspires to world domination. There’s nothing more ruthless than viruses and bacteria—and they’ve been practicing for a very long time.

The fact that the synthetic organisms are likely to have simplified Tinkertoy DNA doesn’t necessarily mean they’re going to be faster and better. It’s more likely that they’ll be dumber and less adaptable. I have a mental image of germ-size MIT nerds putting on gangsta clothes and venturing into alleys to try some rough stuff. And then they meet up with the homies who’ve been keeping it real for a billion years or so.

Filed under  //  Opinions  
Comments (0)
Posted